Let’s hazard an assertion: On or about June 2007, human character modified. To be extra precise—as a result of the phrase human character now feels vintage—we would say as an alternative that the human sensorium modified. By this we don’t essentially imply a sudden and particular alteration in how we understand the world—within the kinds, sources, and quantity of data we take up, and in how we conduct our relationships with mother and father, youngsters, spouses, companions, mentors, pals. But a transition was set in movement, differentiating life earlier than the omnipresent smartphone and life after, and courting its onset to the delivery of the iPhone appears apt.
The above is a free homage to phrases that Virginia Woolf wrote barely greater than a century in the past in regards to the collapse of Victorian gender and sophistication norms, a shift that she positioned extra arbitrarily, with half-ironic playfulness, in December 1910, a decade and a half earlier than her essay appeared. In each instances, the mutation appears without delay huge and slippery, obvious and delicate; the consequences are phenomena with out edges, pervasive but noticeable solely when caught by middle-distance reminiscence. Few issues are as arduous to discern as what was totally different in regards to the current previous.
Capturing adjustments like these calls much less for historical past than for the oldest of kinds, fable. Not far into Ben Lerner’s Transcription, you understand {that a} fable is, in truth, what you may have entered. His new novel could also be set roughly two years in the past, and in a extremely particular and modern milieu, however it is usually a couple of man in the course of his life, away from house, signposts vanished and maps misplaced. Having slipped into a special world, he should now marvel the place, if wherever, he would possibly really feel at house. Solely the reality-bending qualities of fable, maybe, can evoke the edge in human cognition that was crossed simply a short time in the past and convey the thriller of how or if we’ve got remained ourselves on the opposite aspect of that change.
Transcription is the fourth novel by a author who will not be solely, and even primarily, a novelist. Lerner is additionally a poet and critic, and his novels are written as intermittent and experimental eruptions of engagement with some matter of pressing public concern. They match throughout the quasi-biographical, reference-rich, largely plotless style that the 2010s got here to know as “autofiction.” But Lerner’s model, which has the texture of concept in a special mode, has tilted barely towards a a lot older custom, the novel of concepts. Every successive novel has grow to be much less oblique about its topic. His debut, Leaving the Atocha Station, revealed in 2011, is a comic book, cerebral coming-of-age novel a couple of younger poet within the period of the Warfare on Terror. Urgent points declare the foreground extra overtly three years later in 10:04, through which Lerner evokes life within the shadow of local weather change, and in The Topeka College, revealed in 2019. In that guide, his characters confront the decline of American public speech—its degeneration into sorts of unreason and the proto-fascist violence that follows.
The novels’ topicality is leavened by a critic’s erudition and a poet’s facility for turning abstractions into photos. The protagonists of those books partially resemble Lerner himself: a male author from Kansas, the product of an mental household and an elite schooling, finally a resident of New York Metropolis. These figures appear to supply an inner portrait of the writer as nicely. He’s hyper-articulate and earnest, although susceptible to disconcerting matches of duplicity and rage. He’s additionally virtually paralyzingly conscious of being the beneficiary of a rich nation’s tangible and intangible assets, and conscious that these assets aren’t adequate for a life lived nicely. Taken collectively, Lerner’s first three novels have the contours of a trilogy, installments in a collective biography whose theme is the evolving disquiet, even anguish, of late-imperial America.
Transcription is and isn’t like these predecessors. Lerner’s alter ego has returned, unnamed right here and now firmly middle-aged, and the terrain continues to be that of cosmopolitan, credentialed, coastal-urban white America, steadily extra embattled and self-doubting. However the guide, divided into three encounters—conversations, actually—has an unusually stark high quality that provides it the texture of a parable. The subject material can also be totally different. Lerner right here turns to media concept, regardless of the danger that this might sound each within the clouds and mundane: He’s coaching his consideration on the telephones in our pockets, on one thing very small and but boundless in its results.
Right here Lerner’s twin skills give him a novel buy. The “web novel” of current years has tried very arduous to sound similar to the web—to compete with, parody, or mimic the deadpan, understanding wit and fast cuts of on-line discourse. Lerner’s media concept is each extra intentionally, novelistically banal and extra freely lyrical. Transcription is certainly about these telephones and their most literal, pedestrian appearances in our lives. On the similar time, it’s about how they’ve remodeled the very guise of the world, which implies that the novel is about change itself, about what residing by way of epochal transition is like. Attempting to discover this course of is a challenge that lacks the dignity or sense of emergency related to confronting local weather catastrophe or authoritarianism. The expertise is going on all over the place; it’s the fish’s concept of water. Serving to us acknowledge the environment we’re immersed in has at all times been Lerner’s expertise.
Transcription opens with its protagonist on a prepare to Windfall, Rhode Island. He’s en path to interview his former faculty mentor, Thomas, a famend German media theorist and artist, for {a magazine} on the event of his ninetieth birthday. It’s early 2024. Masking and speedy testing are nonetheless on his thoughts. Whereas on the prepare, he texts together with his spouse about their daughter’s college nervousness; listens to a chat that his mentor gave half a century earlier; falls asleep and has a disturbing dream about making an attempt to select up his daughter in school and being turned away. Tugged at by each the younger and the outdated, he begins to really feel unmoored. At his resort, getting ready for the interview, he by accident drops his cellphone—which he was relying on to report the interview—right into a clogged sink. It goes “black mirror.”
He has been sundered from the world, unable to find an Apple Retailer the place he may substitute the cellphone, unable to name his mentor to apologize upfront for being late, unable to make a promised FaceTime name to his daughter. He’s as inaccessible because the lifeless. On his technique to the interview, he experiences the shift as a transfiguring estrangement, “a withdrawal indistinguishable from delicate intoxication, the panorama made unusual, the stones stonier.” Unmediated by a display, he’s seized by an virtually unbearably sharp feeling of presence, whereas he’s additionally shifting again into his personal deviceless previous, as if the Windfall of his youth has summoned itself from the underworld. Now we have entered the miraculous, uncannily acquainted, probably treacherous land of fable. Nothing captures the power of know-how higher than an enchantment that removes it, nonetheless briefly. However the scene can also be comically strange; he’s only a man who can’t open his Contacts.
Defamiliarization, in Transcription, at all times swerves again into the acquainted, into realist farce. When he arrives at Thomas’s home, an incoherent disgrace seizes him, and he can’t admit to his mentor that his cellphone is unusable. His frail interlocutor begins to talk—elegantly, passionately—about his personal youth in Hitlerite Germany and the fascist radio speeches that type his earliest recollections, however his phrases should not being captured. And as this unrecorded rhapsody progresses, dementia weaves its spell. Thomas begins to confuse his younger mentee and interviewer together with his personal son, mixing fragments of household wounds and recriminations into his reverie, as if he’s forgotten that he’s being interviewed. Lerner’s protagonist performs alongside politely, anxiously. What else can he do? The interview must start once more tomorrow, with a brand new cellphone, in any case. He fails to admit that nothing has been recorded. Thomas’s sibylline, disorienting phrases slip into the void.
We later study, not directly, that the promised tomorrow by no means comes—that Thomas’s demise has intervened, and the recorded interview by no means happens. The nonevent is the void with which the novel’s following two sections contend. The protagonist, we discover out, has tried to fill it by publishing his dialog with Thomas as if it have been a verbatim final interview, and the revelation of this imposture shocks not solely Thomas’s different acolytes—a “deepfake,” one calls it, made underneath “false pretenses”—but additionally Thomas’s son, Max, the protagonist’s shut buddy from faculty. Their anger makes clear the size of the protagonist’s oedipal betrayal.
Within the novel’s closing part, different crossed alerts and cross-generational misperceptions emerge. Max now speaks, virtually completely uninterrupted, about his personal failed communication together with his father lately. He describes Thomas’s close to demise from COVID in early 2020, throughout which a nurse held a smartphone to his ear in order that Max may say a closing goodbye of forgiveness and apology, a name that Thomas might or might not have heard. Max additionally recounts a later go to together with his recovering father, in the midst of which he surreptitiously recorded their dialog on a cellphone—one other deception. All of that is framed by Max’s narration of his younger daughter’s life-threatening consuming dysfunction and the remedy that saved her: She was allowed to eat whereas glued to her iPad, watching the weird micro-genre of unboxing movies. Max relates all of this with a lucid matter-of-factness, as a result of he’s baffled by it.
One would possibly take Transcription’s closing part as Max’s absolution—tacit, possibly even a bit grudging—of his buddy, and his father’s mentee, for his transgression. Right here the novel comes near a form of mythic decision, one which lets us glimpse a deep, unappeasable need: to have the lifeless, or the lifeless’s appointed representatives, forgive us, in order that we might forgive them for having left us. Lerner, nonetheless, by no means lets us overlook how entangled this want is with energy cords and telephones and screens, all of the ganglia of contemporary, networked life—and the way these gadgets are each bridge and barrier between mother and father, youngsters, and grandchildren.
As Lerner’s alter ego has aged by way of his 4 novels, he has acquired not simply offspring however a profound unease in regards to the totally different world that the following technology already inhabits, one which the mum or dad not solely can’t management however can’t even apprehend, as if the kid’s receptive organs are attuned to as but unnamed hues and better frequencies. In the meantime, the world of getting older mother and father threatens to fade unrecorded. Within the remembered/fabricated interview, Thomas supplies a media metaphor for this—a “cut up display” through which the younger and outdated exist in parallel areas. “The query,” Thomas provides, “is how you can depict the historic adjustments in environment.” Transcription is an try at a solution.
Historic transitions have magically disorienting qualities. Additionally they are a matter of prosaic, minute negotiations. Lerner’s characters at all times have thickly rendered mental lives, however in Transcription their intellection is directed, greater than ever earlier than, towards what you would possibly name “getting used to it,” discovering methods to acclimatize to that new environment. To the communication-and-storage gadgets of their pockets that, excess of any postmodern philosophy, have erased the sensation of embodied, subjective presence on the planet. To the nervousness issues of their youngsters, which have the portentous thriller of an oracle’s riddle. To the garbling, which the novel relays in its opening part, of collective social-historical reminiscence.
On this approach a minimum of, Transcription is conventional. When fiction contends with technological change, it usually situates that change within the context of generational loss. Marcel Proust’s reflection on the phone, within the third quantity of In Search of Misplaced Time, occurs throughout a glitchy long-distance name with the narrator’s grandmother, through which her disembodied voice, decreased by telephony to tympanic vibration, turns into a premonition of the grave. So too in Lerner. Mother and father and mentors die, traces of them captured (or not) solely within the fragile black field of the system. Youngsters appear accessible solely by way of it. The center-generation expertise, the bidirectional mourning that comes of being cut up between the vanishing and the emergent, preoccupies Transcription.
If Lerner has a solution about how you can acclimate, it’s in Transcription’s flip away from the narration of consciousness, all of these second ideas and dreamy associations which have till now been his fiction’s major mode. Its closing part is simply speech—concurrently confessional, therapeutic, and testimonial—as if Lerner wanted a type indifferent from the only thoughts. We’re left simply with voices, and people voices, within the novel’s delicate and canny repetitions, start to merge with each other, turning into polyphonic. Phrases and pictures from earlier within the novel return, echoed, not assignable to explicit people.
It’s a approach of capturing the great de-selving of the networked world. On this novel, one technology will depart earlier than needing to regulate to it. One technology won’t ever have identified anything. And one technology would possibly be capable to report its taking place, to function the seismograph of a cognitive-technological shift. That is what one recollects of Transcription: not an motion, not even actually a scene, however a state of affairs—the sensation of turning into much less and fewer of an individual. It’s a hole feeling, however unusually additionally a sense of heightened sensitivity to virtually the whole lot, together with your personal disappearance. In all the novel’s layered voices, one can hear the trembling of elegy.
Early within the guide, Lerner’s protagonist recollects a go to to the well-known glass flowers within the Harvard Museum of Pure Historical past: small, painfully fragile artifacts, mimicking nature with hallucinatory element, suspended rigorously from wires. He notices—or imagines; it’s not possible to inform—that they’re “vibrating imperceptibly.” He thinks, “The flowers have been recording devices of beautiful sensitivity.” They’re like seismographs, but additionally like telephones, like information saved within the cloud, within the air—“air looms,” Thomas jokingly puns at one level. The world, in Transcription, is turning into air: the depersonalized, dematerialized, impalpable crossing of digital alerts. The glass flowers, nonetheless, recommend that artwork can nonetheless reply to fluctuations in, and of, the air. Lerner’s novel comes as shut as we will but think about to honoring their delicate approach of registering a change that’s all over the place round us—and that’s making nonsense of the distinction between inside us and out of doors us.
This text seems within the Could 2026 print version with the headline “The Feeling of Turning into Much less and Much less of a Individual.”
While you purchase a guide utilizing a hyperlink on this web page, we obtain a fee. Thanks for supporting The Atlantic.
