Saturday, February 7, 2026
HomeEducationTexas Expands Bluebonnet Curriculum, Ramping Up Problem to Established Okay-12 Corporations

Texas Expands Bluebonnet Curriculum, Ramping Up Problem to Established Okay-12 Corporations

Schooling firms promoting curriculum within the nation’s second-largest Okay-12 market will face elevated competitors from Texas’ in-house studying assets following the approval of a brand new suite of Bluebonnet Studying packages.

The Texas State Board of Schooling has accepted 19 new state-developed merchandise for the adopted listing of educational supplies as a part of the 2025 curriculum adoption cycle, including to the Bluebonnet curriculum lineup that’s anticipated to proceed rising within the coming years.

Laws handed in 2023 fully overhauled the state’s curriculum adoption course of and directed funding to the Texas Schooling Company to create its personal educational supplies. These supplies now compete instantly with conventional training publishers.

Permitted for the 2025 state-adopted listing are TEA-developed supplies for geometry, algebra II, Spanish math Okay-6, and Spanish language arts and studying Okay-5. They be a part of different educational supplies created by the state training company accepted final 12 months for ELA Okay-5, phonics Okay-3, math grades Okay-8, and algebra 1.

Every of these TEA curriculum packages qualifies for a brand new state incentive that gives faculty districts with an additional $40 per scholar yearly once they choose educational supplies from the state-adopted listing.

Throughout debate final week, the state-developed Spanish language arts and studying submissions for grades Okay–5 confronted a number of votes from the 15-member, Republican-majority panel. One board member sought to take away the packages from the accepted listing, whereas one other pushed to delay a last vote till January, citing incomplete translations from the English variations.

Different board members pushed again, saying Spanish-speaking Okay-12 college students additionally deserve entry to state-developed curriculum of their native language.

“What I’d like achieved is the correction of the interpretation points,” mentioned Marisa Perez Diaz, a Democratic board member from San Antonio, who voted to approve the supplies however emphasised her expectation for the TEA to make the required adjustments.

Spanish-language translations of English merchandise don’t have to match word-for-word as a result of the state requirements could be totally different in every language, a TEA staffer informed board members. The company will nonetheless have time to submit revisions following the board’s vote.

Within the coming years, the state training company is planning to submit extra Texas-developed educational supplies for acceptance onto the state-adopted listing, in accordance with a presentation TEA employees gave at an educational coordinators convention late final 12 months.

For the upcoming 2026 adoption cycle, the TEA plans to submit Bluebonnet supplies for superior math in grades 6 and seven. In subsequent cycles, the company might increase its Bluebonnet choices to incorporate Okay-5 built-in content material — together with studying, math, science, and social research — ELA for grades 6-8, and prekindergarten packages in English and Spanish.

Greater than 200 Studying Assets Permitted

Districts typically depend on a state’s accepted listing when deciding on educational supplies, partially as a result of the approval course of serves as a type of centralized vetting that many faculty programs lack the capability to conduct independently.

Since 2011, Texas faculty districts have had broad latitude to pick supplies that aren’t included on the state’s adopted listing.

Nevertheless, the brand new monetary incentive for districts to decide on supplies from the state’s listing might create a bifurcated market, disadvantaging distributors whose merchandise don’t land on the accepted roster of assets eligible for added state funding.

For the 2025 adoption cycle, the state board thought-about the next supplies for Texas’ adopted listing: math Okay-12; English language arts grades 6-12 (English and Spanish); phonics Okay-3; and supplemental math Okay-12.

As a part of a revamped curriculum adoption framework, Texas is utilizing an “evergreen” submission course of that enables publishers to submit supplies not just for new topics listed for the present 12 months’s name, but additionally for topics reviewed in prior cycles.

That made all topic areas from the 2024 adoption cycle — English language arts, grades Okay-5; Spanish language arts, grades Okay-5; phonics, grades Okay-3; and math, grades Okay-12 — eligible once more this 12 months.

Final 12 months, the primary underneath the state’s new adoption framework, virtually 100 educational assets had been accepted by the state board, together with submissions from 13 publishers and the TEA.

For the 2025 adoption cycle, the state board agreed to evaluate 308 educational supplies from no less than 34 distinctive publishers.

Of these, 238 studying packages from 28 publishers, together with the TEA, had been accepted for the state-adopted listing, whereas 35 educational supplies had been positioned on a proposed rejection listing, doubtlessly barring them from buy within the Texas market. The rest had been positioned on the state’s “no-action” listing.

A number of the largest training publishers had their supplies accepted for the state-adopted listing this 12 months for the primary time underneath the brand new system, qualifying their merchandise for the brand new state incentive.

They embrace: Scholastic, McGraw Hill, Carnegie Studying, Discovery Schooling, Renaissance Studying, and HMH.

HMH’s submissions drew probably the most scrutiny. A number of board members sought a number of instances final week to take away the corporate’s merchandise — together with Okay-5 English and Spanish language arts and supplemental math, grades 3-8 — from the accepted listing.

A number of conservative board members objected to studying modules within the Okay-5 language arts supplies that addressed inexperienced power and eco-friendly meals choices, together with passages about consuming bugs.

Earlier than a last vote on Friday, Brandon Corridor, a Republican board member from a suburb west of Fort Value, mentioned he didn’t really feel snug together with HMH’s supplies alongside different accepted studying assets eligible for the state incentive. The supplies, he mentioned, promote “an agenda” round sustainability and shifting away from consuming beef.

“That is positively not one thing my constituents … would need their children studying, selling them to eat bugs,” he mentioned. “We’re Texas. We’re a cattle-producing state.”

Board members mentioned that they had been in dialogue with the corporate to make revisions, however Corridor mentioned, “HMH has a big market share, and I need to work with them … however for this go spherical, they’ve misplaced my belief.”

His vote in opposition to the HMH supplies was labeled “short-sighted” by some on the board, partially as a result of the corporate’s submissions acquired sturdy general scores from reviewers.

“It’s frequent for kids world wide to study concerning the consuming practices of different cultures,” mentioned Rebecca Bell-Metereau, a Democratic board member from a suburb of Austin.

Problems With Creating ‘Treatment Interval’ for the ‘Rejected’ Record

Earlier this 12 months, state lawmakers handed a measure — Home Invoice 100 — that makes staying off the rejected listing a prime precedence for training firms.

Beneath that regulation, Texas districts and constitution colleges are prohibited from shopping for supplies on the state-rejected listing. Districts that bought, or already carried out, rejected studying assets must discontinue their use.

However lawmakers handed the measure months after publishers submitted supplies for the 2025 adoption cycle, leaving firms unaware that their merchandise might be banned in Texas.

“Workers didn’t suppose that was honest and that folk ought to know the principles forward of time,” mentioned state board Chair Aaron Kinsey, a Republican from Midland.

Final week, state board members hung out contemplating a “remedy interval,” permitting for publishers to resubmit their supplies to maneuver onto the accepted or no-action lists.

With out that, “the impression on these publishers could be very actual. It will imply merchandise wouldn’t be capable of be used … and publishers wouldn’t have a chance to make amends,” Kinsey mentioned.

Nevertheless, the state board confronted a logistical hurdle. The TEA lacks out there curriculum reviewers within the close to time period. Contracts with current reviewers expired final week, and TEA employees informed the board there isn’t any method to prolong these agreements.

The earliest reviewers might look over submissions from the proposed rejected listing is that this summer time. In that state of affairs, the state board wouldn’t finalize choices till the autumn.

That timeline complicates district resolution making, mentioned Tom Maynard, a Republican board member from an Austin suburb. Is any district going to “roll the cube,” he requested, on a product that might be banned at the beginning of the varsity 12 months?

“That could be a de facto rejection anyway as a result of what number of faculty districts are going to take that likelihood?” he mentioned.

The board thought-about rushing up the method by bypassing curriculum reviewers and reviewing resubmissions internally, however opted in opposition to that strategy.

In the end, firms on the proposed rejected listing for 2025 have an extra 45 days — till Jan. 6, 2026 — to submit revisions. These submissions will probably be reviewed in the summertime, and the board will vote subsequent November on whether or not to position the supplies on the ultimate rejected listing or transfer them to the accepted or no-action lists.

Corporations that miss the January deadline may have their merchandise positioned on the ultimate rejected listing and barred from district buy or use.

The method and timeline established final week apply solely to the 2025 adoption cycle.

“In January, we’ll speak about a longer-term resolution,” mentioned Kinsey.


RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments