This press launch initially appeared on-line.
Key factors:
Whereas there may be large settlement that scholar engagement performs a significant position in studying, educators proceed to face uncertainty about what engagement seems to be like, how greatest to measure it, and the right way to maintain it, in accordance with a brand new research from Discovery Training.
Training Insights 2025–2026: Fueling Studying By means of Engagement captures prevailing attitudes and beliefs on the subject of engagement from 1,398 superintendents, academics, dad and mom, and college students from throughout america. Survey knowledge was collected in Could 2025 by Hanover Analysis on behalf of Discovery Training.
“Discovery Training carried out the Training Insights report to realize a deeper understanding of how engagement is outlined, noticed, and nurtured in Okay-12 lecture rooms nationwide, and we’re grateful to the individuals who shared their views and insights with us,” mentioned Brian Shaw, Discovery Training’s Chief Govt Officer. “One of the essential findings of this report is that engagement is seen as important to studying, however is inconsistently outlined, noticed, and supported in Okay-12 lecture rooms. I consider this highlights the necessity for a extra standardized strategy to measuring scholar engagement and connecting it to tutorial achievement. Discovery Training has launched into an effort to handle these challenges, and we stay up for sharing extra as our work progresses.”
Key findings of the Training Insights 2025–2026: Fueling Studying By means of Engagement report embrace:
Engagement is broadly acknowledged as a key driver of studying and success. Ninety-three p.c of educators surveyed agreed that scholar engagement is a essential metric for understanding total achievement, and 99 p.c of superintendents polled consider scholar engagement is without doubt one of the high predictors of success in school. Lastly, 92 p.c of scholars mentioned that participating classes make faculty extra pleasing.
However educators disagree on the highest indicators of engagement. Seventy-two p.c of academics rated asking considerate questions because the strongest indicator of scholar engagement. Nevertheless, 54 p.c of superintendents recognized performing nicely on assessments as a high engagement indicator. That is almost twice as excessive as academics, who rank assessments among the many lowest indicators of engagement.
College leaders and academics disagree on if their faculties have methods for measuring engagement. Whereas 99 p.c of superintendents and 88 p.c of principals mentioned their district has an intentional strategy for measuring engagement, solely 60 p.c of academics agreed. Additional, almost one-third of academics mentioned {that a} lack of clear, shared definitions of scholar engagement is a high problem to measuring engagement successfully.
Educators and college students differ on their perceptions of engagement ranges. Whereas 63 p.c of scholars agreed with the assertion “College students are extremely engaged in class,” solely 45 p.c of academics and 51 p.c of principals surveyed agreed with the identical assertion.
College students charge their very own engagement a lot larger than their friends. Seventy p.c of elementary college students perceived themselves as engaged, however solely 42 p.c perceived their friends as engaged. Fifty-nine p.c of center faculty college students perceived themselves engaged in studying, however solely 36 p.c perceived their friends as engaged. Lastly, 61 p.c of highschool college students perceived themselves as engaged, however solely 39 p.c described their friends as engaged.
Proximity to studying modifications impressions of AI. Two-thirds of scholars consider AI might assist them study sooner, but fewer than half of academics report utilizing AI themselves to finish duties. Solely 57 p.c of academics agreed with the assertion “I ceaselessly find out about optimistic methods college students are utilizing AI,” whereas 87 p.c of principals and 98 p.c of superintendents agree. Likewise, solely 53 p.c of academics agreed with the assertion “I’m excited in regards to the potential for AI to help instructing and studying,” whereas 83 p.c of principals and 94 p.c of superintendents agreed.
